Post-Export: The Planning Iteration Cycle Tips

Congratulations! You've exported your project plan and shared it with stakeholders. But here's the thing about hardware project planning: the first version is rarely the final version. Stakeholders need to help evaluate the plan's viability before the project starts — checking feasibility, identifying missing requirements, and assessing whether the proposed approach actually makes sense for the business.

Soufflé is designed around this reality. Instead of treating planning as a one-time event, it supports the iterative cycle that hardware teams actually experience.

Understanding the Cycle

After exporting your timeline, you're entering what we call the feedback and iteration loop:

Step 1: Present to the Right Stakeholders

Different stakeholders need different views of your project plan. Share milestone exports with executives who need high-level delivery dates, critical path exports with technical teams who need to understand dependencies, and individual group exports with specific departments who only need to see their relevant work streams.

Step 2: Collect Feedback

Stakeholders might question assumptions about technical feasibility, point out missing regulatory requirements, or suggest alternative approaches based on their expertise. This feedback often reveals gaps in your initial planning or highlights risks you hadn't considered.

Step 3: Return to Planning

Armed with new information, you come back to Soufflé to update your project. This might mean adjusting dependencies in Diagram View, revising time estimates in Resource Plan View, or adding new milestones entirely.

Step 4: Preserve Previous Versions

Before making significant changes, you can duplicate your project to preserve the working version. This lets you experiment with adjustments while keeping a reference point for comparison.

Step 5: Generate Updated Exports

Once your revisions are complete, export new timeline versions to share the updated plan with stakeholders.

This cycle repeats until everyone's aligned and the plan is ready for execution.

When to Duplicate vs. Modify

Deciding whether to modify your existing project or create a duplicate depends on the scope of changes. Keep in mind that duplicated projects count toward your active project limits, so you may need to archive older versions or upgrade your plan if you're creating multiple variations.

Modify the existing project when:

  • Making small timeline adjustments (shifting dates by a few days)
  • Adding missing details or clarifying task descriptions
  • Fixing obvious errors or oversights
  • Updating resource estimates based on better information

Duplicate the project when:

  • Exploring significantly different approaches or timelines
  • Stakeholders request major scope changes that might not work
  • You want to preserve the current version for comparison
  • Testing "what-if" scenarios with different constraints
Working with Project Duplicates

Duplicating projects in Soufflé creates an exact copy of your current project state, including all dependencies, time estimates, and settings. This gives you a clean slate for major revisions while preserving your original work.

To duplicate a project:

  1. From your dashboard, click the three-dot menu (⋮) on the project card
  2. Select "Duplicate project"
  3. Give the duplicate a clear name (like "Hardware Launch Plan v2" or "Q3 Timeline — Revised")
  4. Make your changes in the duplicated version

Organizing multiple versions:

  • Use clear naming conventions that indicate the version or variation
  • Include dates or version numbers to track progression
  • Archive older versions once they're no longer needed for reference
Managing Feedback Effectively

Hardware project feedback often comes from multiple sources with different perspectives and priorities. Here's how to handle this complexity:

Categorize feedback by type:

  • Timeline feedback: "This needs to happen sooner/later"
  • Dependency feedback: "You missed this step" or "These can happen in parallel"
  • Resource feedback: "This will take longer than you think"
  • Scope feedback: "We also need to include..."

Track feedback sources:

Note who provided each piece of feedback. Engineering teams might spot technical dependencies, while executives focus on business milestones, and vendors know their own lead times best.

Address conflicts in feedback:

When different stakeholders provide conflicting guidance, use your duplicated projects to model different scenarios. Show stakeholders the timeline implications of their requests to help resolve conflicts.

Common Iteration Scenarios

The "Reality Check" Revision

Initial timelines often prove optimistic once stakeholders review them. Common adjustments include longer vendor lead times, additional approval steps, or more complex regulatory requirements. These revisions typically involve extending timelines and adding buffer time.

The "Scope Creep" Addition

Stakeholders remember additional requirements or dependencies during review. Rather than cramming these into your existing timeline, duplicate your project and create a version that properly sequences the new requirements.

The "Resource Constraint" Adjustment

Finance or operations teams point out resource limitations you hadn't considered. Maybe that specialized team can't work on two tasks simultaneously, or critical equipment isn't available when you need it. These constraints often require restructuring dependencies rather than just adjusting dates.

The "Vendor Feedback" Update

External partners provide more accurate lead times or reveal dependencies in their processes. Since vendor relationships are critical in hardware development, these updates often have cascading effects throughout your timeline.

Maintaining Project Momentum

During the iteration cycle, it's easy for projects to stall in endless planning. Here are strategies to keep moving forward:

Set feedback deadlines

Give stakeholders a clear timeframe for providing input. "Please review and provide feedback by Friday so we can finalize the timeline next week."

Limit iteration rounds

After 2-3 major revision cycles, push for decision-making. Continued refinement often yields diminishing returns and delays execution.

Focus on critical path impact

Prioritize feedback that affects the critical path over nice-to-have adjustments that don't change the overall timeline.

Document assumptions

As you incorporate feedback, note the assumptions behind your revisions. This helps stakeholders understand the reasoning and makes future updates easier.

Preparing for Project Execution

Once stakeholder feedback has been incorporated and the timeline is approved, your Soufflé project becomes the blueprint for execution. Here's how to transition effectively:

Export execution-ready files

Generate CSV exports for import into execution tools like Jira, Asana, or your project management system of choice.

Archive the final planning version

Move your approved project to archived status to preserve it for reference while keeping your active project list focused on current planning work.

Common Questions About Post-Export Workflow

Q: How many project duplicates should I create?

A: Keep it manageable. Generally, 2–3 versions maximum — the original, one major revision, and perhaps a "stretch timeline" scenario. More than that becomes difficult to track.

Q: What if stakeholders keep requesting changes?

A: Set boundaries around revision scope. After the second major iteration, push for decisions rather than continued refinement. Endless planning prevents execution.

Q: Should I archive projects immediately after execution starts?

A: Not necessarily. Keep the project active if you're still using it for reference or if you need to make timeline adjustments during execution. Archive it once the project is complete or you're confident the plan won't need further updates.

Q: How do I handle conflicting feedback from different stakeholders?

A: Create scenarios using duplicated projects to show the timeline impact of each approach. Present both options to decision-makers with clear trade-offs rather than trying to reconcile conflicts yourself.

Related Topics
Need More Help?